Sunday, December 22, 2013

Jackson Boutin                                                                                                               12/22/13
805                                                                                                                                   ELA


                     The Book "David and Goliath" is an unbelievable tale about an underdog named David and a very powerful giant named Goliath.  As the small David slays the mighty Goliath, many readers probably think this is undoable but the message the author Malcolm Gladwell is trying to get through people is that nothing is impossible.  Furthermore, Gladwell argues that the powerful and the strong are neither powerful or strong.  He also stated an underdog can provide opportunities and make something possible that has always seemed impossible or unthinkable. Throughout the book Gladwell gave many examples within basketball, cancer research, and the challenges in being diagnosed with dyslexia to demonstrate that nothing is impossible.

                   One example that Gladwell uses in his book is dyslexia and how it could be not only a disadvantage but an advantage. For instance, in the book it said " How Boies went from a dyslexic construction worker with a high school education to the top of the legal profession is a puzzle, to say the least. The law is built around reading-around cases and opinions and scholarly analyses-and Boies is someone for whom reading is a struggle."  This quote is telling you that for people like Boies, they have accomplished an impossible task.  From a high school education to becoming one of the most famous trial lawyers in the world which involves reading at a very high level, showed how even though he had a problem with reading and writing that didn't stop Boies from achieving his goals.  Boies accomplished this by memorizing every word that the teacher would say rather than take notes.  After law school, he applied the memory technique to his cases.  It says here that "he would boil down the Key points of a long supreme court opinion to a page or so." This shows that even though he couldn't read and write as good as the other students which was a disadvantage, he was forced to utilize and strengthen his memory, advantage, in order to achieve his goals.

                   Another example that Gladwell used was a basketball strategy.  The story of Vivek Ranadive and the Redwood City girls basketball team was a story that will show that what we think of as an advantage and a disadvantage is not always correct.  For instance, Vivek new that his girls team was small and not skilled.  Therefore, in order to obtain experience, he asked someone who knew basketball to help him coach.  Also, he used soccer tactics, used a full court press and as a result they won the games because often time the opposing team did not have an opportunity to score.  That's how girls team won games. By the end of the basketball season, the girls' team went to the semi finals.

                 My final example that will show how nothing is impossible is Gladwell's example with Martin Luther King, Jr during the Civil Right Movement . Dr. King was outgunned and over matched.  He was the underdog.  He was from a community that was always an underdog.  The author stated that "African Americans had spent a few hundred years learning how to cope with being outgunned and over matched.  Along the way they had learned a few things about battling giants."  This showed how even though the African Americans were outnumbered, they learned different skills and lessons to help them throughout various challenges in order to obtain justice.

               In conclusion the giant doesn't always win and just because someone is smaller or not as strong as someone else doesn't mean there at an disadvantage.  Just like all the stories that Gladwell used as examples which showed how a disadvantage can later develop to be an advantage. 




                

 


1 comment:

  1. This is a good post about Gladwell's book. Just make sure to identify it as non-fiction; it's not *about* David and Goliath; that's a metaphor!

    ReplyDelete